
Weekly Digital Assets Regulatory Brief: Week 09-2026
19-signal global intelligence brief spanning 13 jurisdictions: OCC publishes GENIUS Act NPRM for stablecoin issuer licensing while granting Crypto.com a conditional national trust bank charter. EU proposes blanket crypto transaction ban on Russia in 20th sanctions package. UK lays Cryptoassets Regulations 2025 before Parliament with FCA consultations opening and influencer fines landing. SEC issues 2% capital haircut for qualifying payment stablecoins. White House sets March 1 deadline on CLARITY Act stablecoin yield dispute. Basel SCO60 enters national implementation with 1,250% risk weight for unbacked crypto. FATF grey-lists Kuwait and Papua New Guinea. Hong Kong SFC issues ASPIRe package and signs Kenya MoU. Pakistan creates PVARA. Brazil implements comprehensive crypto framework. Sri Lanka, Indonesia, and South Africa advance new regimes.
Issue #26-09

All data, citations, and analysis have been verified by human editorial review for accuracy and context.
TL;DR
- •OCC publishes GENIUS Act NPRM establishing the federal licensing framework for non-bank stablecoin issuers and grants Crypto.com a conditional national trust bank charter - the first for a major crypto exchange - while the White House sets a March 1 deadline to resolve the CLARITY Act stablecoin yield dispute
- •EU proposes a blanket ban on crypto transactions with Russia and a prohibition on digital ruble dealings under its 20th sanctions package, while AMLA publishes draft RTS standardizing sanctions penalties across all EU member states under AMLD6
- •UK lays the Cryptoassets Regulations 2025 before Parliament expanding the RAO perimeter with FCA application gateway opening September 2026, while the FCA simultaneously fines seven influencers for unauthorised crypto financial promotions - its first major social media enforcement
- •Basel SCO60 cryptoasset prudential standard enters national implementation phase with 1,250% risk weight for Group 2 unbacked crypto, as the SEC issues a 2% capital haircut for qualifying payment stablecoins under Rule 15c3-1 and the Fed ties GENIUS Act implementation to the Basel framework
- •FATF grey-lists Kuwait and Papua New Guinea while confirming two forthcoming VA risk reports, Hong Kong SFC issues its ASPIRe package with perpetual contracts and market-maker framework, and three emerging markets - Pakistan, Brazil, and Sri Lanka - advance comprehensive VASP regimes
Executive Summary
Week 09, 2026 • Published February 26, 2026
The last week of February 2026 marks a structural acceleration in stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold regulation across the three largest financial systems. In the United States, the OCC published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking implementing the GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing's licensing framework for non-bank stablecoin issuers, while separately granting Crypto.com a conditional national trust bank charter - the first for a major crypto exchangeA platform where users can buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrencies. The SECU.S. federal agency regulating securities markets and protecting investors issued staff guidance applying a 2% capital haircut to qualifying payment stablecoins under Rule 15c3-1, replacing the prior 100% deduction. The White House set a March 1 deadline to resolve the stablecoin yield dispute holding up the CLARITY ActUS legislation defining the market structure and jurisdictional oversight for trading payment stablecoins, and NASAA pushed back against federal pre-emption in pending legislation. Fed Vice Chair Bowman explicitly tied forthcoming US stablecoin prudential rules to the Basel framework, where the SCO60 cryptoasset standard has now entered national implementation with a 1,250% risk weight for unbacked crypto exposures.
In Europe, the proposed 20th sanctions package would impose a blanket ban on crypto transactionsA transfer of value or data recorded on a blockchain, verified by network participants, and permanently added to the distributed ledger with Russia and prohibit all dealings involving Russia's digital ruble. AMLA published draft RTS standardizing sanctions penalty methodologies under AMLD6, and CySEC reminded Cyprus-authorized CASPsEntity providing crypto services under EU MiCA requiring authorization and regulatory compliance of the February 27 MiCAThe EU's comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto-assets, establishing harmonized rules for issuers and service providers across all 27 Member States application deadline. The United Kingdom laid the Cryptoassets Regulations 2025 before Parliament, formally expanding the Regulated Activities Order, with the FCA simultaneously opening two consultations and fining seven social media influencers for unauthorised crypto financial promotions - its first major enforcement under the crypto promotion rules.
In Hong Kong, the SFC issued its ASPIRe package - granting a 12th VATP license, establishing a perpetual contracts framework for professional investors, and permitting VATP affiliates to act as market makers. The SFC also signed a cross-border supervision MoU with Kenya's Capital Markets Authority. At the global level, FATFGlobal standard-setter for combating money laundering and terrorist financing's February plenary grey-listed Kuwait and Papua New Guinea while confirming two forthcoming reports on offshore VASPs and stablecoins with unhosted wallets. In emerging markets, Pakistan advanced its Virtual AssetsFATF term for digital value representation tradable or transferable electronically Bill creating the PVARA, Brazil's Central Bank implemented Resolutions 517-521 for a market where stablecoins represent 90% of volume, Sri Lanka announced a VASPEntity providing services related to virtual assets, subject to AML regulations framework with travel-rule provisions, Indonesia's Bank Indonesia set a March 31 deadline for new payment system regulations, and South Africa published CARF reporting specifications.
This Week's Signals
Jump to Risk MatrixUnited States
European Union
United Kingdom
Hong Kong
Global Standards
Emerging Markets
Signal Analysis
What Changed: OCC Publishes GENIUS Act NPRM for Stablecoin Issuer Licensing
CriticalRisk: Regulatory/Licensing | Affected: Non-bank stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold issuers, national banks, foreign stablecoin issuers | Horizon: 6-18 months | Confidence: High
Facts: The OCC published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking implementing the GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing's licensing framework for "Federal qualified payment stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold issuers." The NPRM specifies prudential and operational standards including reserve asset eligibility and segregation, liquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price and risk-management expectations, governance and audit requirements, and mandatory redemption at par. National banks and federal savings associations receive a clearer path to issue payment stablecoins through subsidiaries under a single OCC licensing regime. Foreign issuers targeting US users face heightened requirements around holding reserves at US institutions and OCC registration. Fed Vice Chair Bowman testified the same week that the Fed is "working to develop regulations that include capital and liquidity for stablecoin issuers as required by the GENIUS Act," explicitly tying forthcoming prudential rules to the broader Basel framework. The GENIUS Act takes effect on the earlier of 18 months after enactment or 120 days after primary federal regulators issue final rules.
Implications: This NPRM is the operational blueprint for the US stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold market. It establishes that compliant payment stablecoins will not be treated as securities or commodities but as a separate class under bank-style prudential oversight. The parallel Fed work on capital/liquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price rules means stablecoin issuers will face a dual regulatory burden: OCC licensing requirements plus Basel-aligned prudential standards. Firms considering issuing stablecoins in the US need to assess whether to seek status as a "permitted payment stablecoin issuer" via direct OCC license or through a bank-subsidiary route. The timeline trigger mechanism means final rules could accelerate the Act's effective date significantly.
What Changed: EU Proposes Blanket Crypto Transaction Ban on Russia in 20th Sanctions Package
CriticalRisk: Sanctions/Compliance | Affected: CASPsEntity providing crypto services under EU MiCA requiring authorization and regulatory compliance, custodians, exchanges, payment firms with EU operations | Horizon: Immediate-3 months | Confidence: High
Facts: The EU's proposed 20th sanctions package against Russia includes a crypto-focused ban that would prohibit all crypto transactionsA transfer of value or data recorded on a blockchain, verified by network participants, and permanently added to the distributed ledger involving Russian counterparties - not just listed entities, but any Russia-based counterparty. The package would also introduce a total ban on dealings involving Russia's CBDCDigital form of a nation's fiat currency issued and guaranteed by the central bank (digital ruble) within EU jurisdiction. This builds on the 19th sanctions package, which already targeted specific Russia-linked stablecoins including A7A5. The package includes the first use of the EU Anti-Circumvention Tool, targeting Kyrgyzstan as a Russian evasion hub. The draft has not yet been adopted by the Council.
Implications: A blanket ban on crypto transactionsA transfer of value or data recorded on a blockchain, verified by network participants, and permanently added to the distributed ledger with Russia represents the most aggressive use of sanctions tools against digital assets by any major jurisdiction. For CASPsEntity providing crypto services under EU MiCA requiring authorization and regulatory compliance and exchanges operating within EU jurisdiction, this requires immediate review of screening systems to detect and block not only Russia-based counterparties but also digital ruble and Russia-linked stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold exposure. The anti-circumvention provisions targeting Kyrgyzstan mean firms must also monitor indirect flows through Central Asian channels. Compliance teams should prepare screening rule updates for Council adoption.
What Changed: UK Cryptoassets Regulations 2025 Laid Before Parliament
CriticalRisk: Regulatory/Licensing | Affected: Crypto exchanges, stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold issuers, custodians, brokers operating in UK | Horizon: Application gateway Sep 2026, regime Oct 2027 | Confidence: High
Facts: The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Cryptoassets) Regulations 2025 have been laid before Parliament, bringing a wide set of cryptoasset activities into the Regulated Activities Order perimeter. Regulated activities will include issuance of qualifying stablecoins, operating qualifying cryptoasset trading platforms, safeguarding qualifying cryptoassets, and certain offers and admissions to trading. The FCA simultaneously published two consultation papers: CP25/40 on regulating cryptoasset activities and CP25/41 on admissions, disclosures, and market abuseArtificial interference with price or volume to mislead market participants for cryptoassets. The application gateway opens September 2026, with the new regime starting October 2027.
Implications: This is the UK's most significant expansion of financial services regulation since the FCA's temporary registration regime for crypto AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities. The RAO expansion means that crypto firms currently operating under the limited registration regime will need full FCA authorization. The September 2026 gateway gives firms approximately 18 months to prepare applications. CP25/40 and CP25/41 will define the detailed conduct, prudential, and market-abuse requirements. The October 2027 regime start provides a hard deadline for compliance.
What Changed: OCC Grants Crypto.com Conditional National Trust Bank Charter
HighRisk: Licensing/Market structure | Affected: Crypto exchanges, trust companies, custodians | Horizon: 3-12 months | Confidence: High
Facts: The OCC granted conditional approval to charter Foris Dax National Trust Bank, d.b.a. Crypto.com National Trust Bank, as a limited-purpose national trust bank. The conditional nature means Crypto.com must satisfy pre-opening conditions around capital, governance, risk management, internal controls, and compliance before commencing operations. A national trust charter reduces the need for multiple state money-transmitter and trust company licenses but does not confer FDIC deposit insurance or full commercial banking powers. The charter places Crypto.com under OCC safety and soundness, BSAU.S. anti-money laundering law applied to crypto businesses by FinCEN/AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities, OFAC/sanctions, governance, and operational risk expectations.
Implications: This is the first conditional national trust bank charter granted to a major crypto exchangeA platform where users can buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrencies, establishing a federal pathway for crypto-native firms to operate under bank-style supervision. While the charter is limited-purpose, it consolidates state-by-state licensing into a single federal framework. Combined with the GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing NPRM, this signals the OCC's willingness to bring crypto firms within the national banking perimeter. Other large exchanges and custodians are likely evaluating similar charter applications.
What Changed: SEC Issues 2% Capital Haircut for Qualifying Payment Stablecoins
HighRisk: Capital/Market structure | Affected: Broker-dealers, market makers, trading firms | Horizon: Immediate | Confidence: High
Facts: The SECU.S. federal agency regulating securities markets and protecting investors Division of Trading and Markets updated its crypto FAQs to treat proprietary positions in qualifying "payment stablecoins" as having a ready market under Rule 15c3-1 (Net Capital Rule), applying a 2% capital haircut instead of the previous 100% deduction. Commissioner Hester Peirce published a statement titled "Cutting by Two Would Do" summarizing the rationale. The guidance also addresses Rule 15c3-3 (Customer Protection Rule) treatment of stablecoins. Peirce has invited comment on formally amending Rule 15c3-1 to explicitly address payment stablecoins.
Implications: The reduction from 100% to 2% capital deduction is transformative for broker-dealers holding stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold positions. Under the previous treatment, every dollar of stablecoin held required a full dollar of net capital set aside - making stablecoin integration economically prohibitive. At 2%, stablecoins are treated comparably to highly liquid, low-risk financial instruments. Broker-dealers should update Rule 15c3-1 capital models and inventory policies immediately. The invitation for formal comment signals a rulemaking process that could codify this treatment permanently.
What Changed: White House Sets March 1 Deadline on CLARITY Act Stablecoin Yield Dispute
HighRisk: Legislative/Policy | Affected: StablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold issuers, DeFiFinancial systems built on blockchain that operate without intermediaries like banks protocols, banks, crypto exchanges | Horizon: Immediate (March 1) | Confidence: Medium
Facts: The White House Crypto Policy Council has been convening banks and crypto firms around a March 1 target date to resolve the stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold yield dispute blocking the CLARITY ActUS legislation defining the market structure and jurisdictional oversight for trading payment stablecoins's progress. The GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing contains an issuer-level yield ban (stablecoin issuers cannot pay interest on stablecoin balances), but the intermediary-level ban remains politically active - banks are pushing for deposit-like treatment that would restrict crypto platforms from offering yield on idle stablecoin balances. The CLARITY Act, which passed the House in July 2025, explicitly excludes stablecoins from its "digital commodity" definition but remains stalled over these unresolved provisions.
Implications: Resolution of the stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold yield dispute is widely seen as a prerequisite to broader US digital asset legislation. If the March 1 deadline produces a compromise, it could unblock both the CLARITY ActUS legislation defining the market structure and jurisdictional oversight for trading payment stablecoins and harmonize with the GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing framework. If it fails, expect further delays in the US legislative timeline. For DeFiFinancial systems built on blockchain that operate without intermediaries like banks protocols and crypto platforms currently offering yield on stablecoins, the outcome will determine whether that business model remains viable under federal law. Banks are betting that restricting intermediary yield will push stablecoin users toward traditional deposit products.
What Changed: HK SFC Issues ASPIRe Package - 12th VATP License, Perpetual Contracts, Market-Makers
HighRisk: Product expansion/Licensing | Affected: Licensed VATPs, institutional brokers, market makers | Horizon: Immediate | Confidence: High
Facts: The SFC updated its list of licensed virtual assetFATF term for digital value representation tradable or transferable electronically trading platforms to add Victory Fintech Company Limited (brand: VDX) as the 12th fully licensed VATP, effective February 13 - the first new license since June 2025. Separately, the SFC issued its ASPIRe roadmap package on February 14, including: a circular on licensed corporations providing VA dealing services with financing capabilities; a high-level framework for virtual asset perpetual contracts offered to professional investors only; and a circular permitting affiliates of licensed VATPs to act as market makers, subject to conflict-of-interest safeguards. The SFC also set out a framework for VA brokers using omnibus accounts with SFC-licensed platforms to offer financing for VA dealing.
Implications: Hong Kong is systematically expanding its regulated digital asset product suite to match offshore offerings within a supervised framework. The perpetual contracts framework brings one of the most popular crypto derivative products under SFC oversight. The market-maker affiliate structure addresses a critical liquidityThe ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without affecting its price challenge while maintaining conflict-of-interest controls. The 12th VATP license demonstrates the SFC is still granting new licenses. Institutional investors seeking regulated Asia-Pacific venues now have an expanding product range on SFC-licensed platforms.
What Changed: FATF February Plenary - Kuwait and PNG Grey-Listed, Two VA Reports Confirmed
HighRisk: AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities/CFT compliance | Affected: VASPs, stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold issuers, self-custody providers, correspondent banks | Horizon: 3-12 months | Confidence: High
Facts: The FATFGlobal standard-setter for combating money laundering and terrorist financing February 2026 plenary (Mexico City, 11-13 February) added Kuwait and Papua New Guinea to the "jurisdictions under increased monitoring" (grey list); no jurisdictions were removed. FATF confirmed it will publish two additional reports: one addressing offshore VASPs and the second covering stablecoins paired with unhosted wallets. FATF reiterated its call for action on Iran and maintained other high-risk country designations. The plenary is also shifting toward effectiveness metrics - regulators will be judged on demonstrable enforcement outcomes, not just paper compliance with Recommendation 15 and the Travel RuleRequirement to share sender and recipient information for crypto transactions above a threshold.
Implications: The grey-listing of Kuwait and Papua New Guinea requires immediate review of correspondent banking relationships and enhanced due diligenceProcess of verifying customer identity and assessing risk triggers. The two forthcoming VAFATF term for digital value representation tradable or transferable electronically reports will set the agenda for the next cycle of national-level AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities rule updates. The focus on offshore VASPs signals that jurisdictions hosting VASPs without adequate supervision face escalating FATFGlobal standard-setter for combating money laundering and terrorist financing scrutiny. The stablecoins/unhosted wallets report will likely recommend enhanced due diligence for stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold transfers to self-hosted wallets. The shift toward effectiveness metrics raises the bar for all jurisdictions.
What Changed: AMLA Publishes Draft RTS on Sanctions Penalties Under AMLD6
HighRisk: Enforcement/Compliance | Affected: CASPsEntity providing crypto services under EU MiCA requiring authorization and regulatory compliance, banks, payment institutions across EU | Horizon: 6-18 months | Confidence: High
Facts: AMLA published a consultation paper on draft regulatory technical standards under Article 53(10) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 (AMLD6). The RTS establishes a methodology for periodic penalty payments and pecuniary sanctions, with criteria including repetition of breaches, cooperation with authorities, remediation speed, and whether policies and procedures were "manifestly inadequate." The framework explicitly structures how sanctions should increase for serious, repeated, or wilful breaches, and decrease where there is strong cooperation. It provides for business restrictions, authorization withdrawal, or suspension for very serious category-3/4 breaches. National competent authorities including BaFin, CySEC, FMA, and the Bank of Lithuania will apply these RTS once finalized.
Implications: These RTS will transform the enforcement landscape across EU member states by replacing disparate national sanctioning practices with a standardized EU-wide framework. For CASPsEntity providing crypto services under EU MiCA requiring authorization and regulatory compliance supervised under MiCAThe EU's comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto-assets, establishing harmonized rules for issuers and service providers across all 27 Member States, this means more predictable but potentially harsher penalties for AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities/sanctions failings. The explicit scaling provisions mean firms with repeated or wilful breaches face significantly increased financial exposure. Compliance teams should ensure breach logging, remediation documentation, and board-level oversight are robust ahead of finalization.
What Changed: Basel SCO60 Enters National Implementation - 1,250% Risk Weight for Unbacked Crypto
HighRisk: Prudential/Capital | Affected: Banks, bank-affiliated crypto entities, stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold issuers | Horizon: 2026-2027 | Confidence: High
Facts: The Basel Committee's cryptoasset prudential standard (SCO60), which formally took effect January 1, 2026, is now in the national implementation phase. The standard divides cryptoassets into Group 1 (tokenized traditional assets and qualifying stablecoins, eligible for preferential treatment) and Group 2 (unbacked crypto, facing a 1,250% risk weight - effectively requiring dollar-for-dollar capital). Targeted amendments have tightened the criteria for stablecoins to qualify for Group 1b preferential treatment. The standard includes exposure limits for Group 2 and a final disclosure framework for banks. US implementation is being shaped through the OCC GENIUS NPRM and Fed Vice Chair Bowman's testimony tying stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold capital rules to Basel. Industry is pushing to revisit the permissioned/permissionless distinction and stablecoin treatment criteria.
Implications: The 1,250% risk weight makes direct bank exposure to unbacked cryptoassets economically prohibitive - a deliberate design choice by the Basel Committee. The critical question is how national supervisors implement the standard, particularly the stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold qualification criteria for Group 1b. US implementation through the GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing creates a potential divergence from the Basel baseline: stablecoins that meet GENIUS requirements may receive more favorable treatment than under the bare Basel standard. Banks evaluating crypto custodyService for securely storing and managing cryptocurrency assets, trading, or stablecoin issuance must model capital impact under both the Basel standard and the national implementation version.
What Changed: CySEC Reminds CASPs of MiCA Application Deadline - February 27
MediumRisk: Licensing | Affected: Cyprus-authorized CASPsEntity providing crypto services under EU MiCA requiring authorization and regulatory compliance in MiCAThe EU's comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto-assets, establishing harmonized rules for issuers and service providers across all 27 Member States transition | Horizon: Immediate | Confidence: High
Facts: CySEC reminded Cyprus-authorized Crypto-Asset Service Providers that they must submit a MiCAThe EU's comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto-assets, establishing harmonized rules for issuers and service providers across all 27 Member States authorization application by February 27, 2026 to continue operating under transitional arrangements. CASPsEntity providing crypto services under EU MiCA requiring authorization and regulatory compliance can continue under the national regime until approved, rejected, or July 1, 2026 - whichever comes first.
Implications: Cyprus is one of the most popular MiCAThe EU's comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto-assets, establishing harmonized rules for issuers and service providers across all 27 Member States licensing jurisdictions. Following Bulgaria's early deadline in Week 08, CySEC's reminder reinforces the pattern of NCAs imposing their own MiCA transition timelines. Firms using Cyprus as an EU gateway that have not yet submitted applications face immediate operational risk.
What Changed: FCA Fines Seven Influencers for Unauthorised Crypto Financial Promotions
MediumRisk: Enforcement/Marketing | Affected: Social media influencers, crypto marketing firms, exchanges using influencer marketing | Horizon: Immediate | Confidence: High
Facts: The FCA fined seven social media influencers for issuing unauthorised financial promotions. This is the first major enforcement action under the FCA's crypto financial promotions regime, which brought cryptoasset promotion within the FCA's regulatory perimeter. The action demonstrates the FCA will actively police social media marketing of crypto products.
Implications: This enforcement action establishes precedent: the FCA is treating social media influencer promotions as within its enforcement reach, not just a theoretical regulatory risk. For crypto exchanges and platforms that use influencer marketing in the UK, this requires immediate review of marketing agreements, disclosure requirements, and compliance sign-off processes. Offshore platforms targeting UK consumers through influencers are now on notice that the FCA will pursue individual promoters, not just the platforms themselves.
What Changed: SFC Signs Cross-Border MoU with Kenya Capital Markets Authority
LowRisk: Cross-border cooperation | Affected: Groups with HK and Kenyan operations | Horizon: Ongoing | Confidence: Medium
Facts: Hong Kong's SFC signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Kenya's Capital Markets Authority for cross-border regulatory cooperation on digital assets. The MoU applies to cross-border regulated entities - groups where an SFC-licensed VAFATF term for digital value representation tradable or transferable electronically firm has a related entity regulated by the CMA. It covers event-triggered notifications for major incidents, sanctions events, and cyber events, as well as coordinated thematic reviews on governance, AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities/CFT, and technology risk.
Implications: This is a notable Asia-Africa supervisory cooperation channel for digital assets - one of the first MoUs linking an established APAC financial center with an African regulator on crypto-specific supervision. While the immediate operational impact is limited to firms operating in both jurisdictions, it signals that cross-border supervisory cooperation on digital assets is extending beyond the traditional US/EU/APAC corridor.
What Changed: Pakistan Senate Approves Virtual Assets Bill 2025 - Creates PVARA
MediumRisk: Licensing/Market access | Affected: VASPs, exchanges targeting South Asian markets | Horizon: 6-12 months | Confidence: Medium
Facts: Pakistan's Senate committee approved the Virtual AssetsFATF term for digital value representation tradable or transferable electronically Bill 2025, establishing the Pakistan Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (PVARA) as an autonomous federal regulator. PVARA is empowered to license, regulate, and supervise all entities dealing in virtual assets. Any person or company offering virtual-asset services in or from Pakistan will require a PVARA license, with requirements around incorporation, operational capacity, compliance frameworks, and reporting. Unlicensed operators risk criminal and administrative sanctions. PVARA has simultaneously launched a regulatory sandbox for virtual assets.
Implications: Pakistan represents one of the world's largest populations with growing digital asset adoption. The creation of a dedicated regulatory authority signals the government's intention to build a comprehensive framework. The sandbox launch alongside the legislative process allows PVARA to develop supervisory capacity before the full regime takes effect. For VASPs operating in the South Asian corridor, this adds another jurisdiction where unregulated operations will face criminal exposure.
What Changed: Brazil Central Bank Implements Comprehensive Crypto Regulatory Framework
MediumRisk: Regulatory/Licensing | Affected: Crypto exchanges, stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold issuers, payment firms in Brazil | Horizon: Transition periods active | Confidence: High
Facts: The Central Bank of Brazil published Resolutions 517, 519, 520, and 521 establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for virtual assetFATF term for digital value representation tradable or transferable electronically services, with transition periods for existing institutions. The framework includes crypto within the foreign exchangeA platform where users can buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrencies regulatory perimeter, affecting inbound and outbound flows. Brazil recorded approximately $42.8 billion in crypto transactionA transfer of value or data recorded on a blockchain, verified by network participants, and permanently added to the distributed ledger volume in H1 2025, up 20% year-over-year. Central bank officials have stated that approximately 90% of Brazil's crypto activity now involves stablecoins - primarily dollar-pegged tokens used for payments and cross-border transfers.
Implications: Brazil's regulatory framework explicitly addresses the stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold-dominant usage pattern. The FX classification is particularly significant - firms routing stablecoin transfers through Brazilian counterparties must comply with foreign exchangeA platform where users can buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrencies regulations in addition to AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities/KYCA process where exchanges and financial institutions verify user identity requirements. The scale of the market makes Brazil a material compliance jurisdiction for any firm with Latin American exposure.
What Changed: Bank Indonesia Payments Regulation Effective March 31, 2026
MediumRisk: Regulatory/Licensing | Affected: Payment providers, crypto-adjacent platforms, tokenized payment firms | Horizon: March 31, 2026 | Confidence: Medium
Facts: Bank Indonesia issued Regulation No. 10 of 2025 and an implementing regulation on the Payment System Industry, effective March 31, 2026. The regulations consolidate licensing and oversight of payment providers, capturing crypto-adjacent and tokenized payment schemes within the payment system perimeter.
Implications: Indonesia's population (280 million) and rapidly growing digital payments market make this regulation significant for ASEAN-focused firms. The March 31 effective date creates an immediate compliance window. Firms offering tokenized payment products or stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold-based payment services in Indonesia should assess whether they fall within the new perimeter.
What Changed: Sri Lanka Announces VASP Framework with Travel-Rule Provisions
LowRisk: Licensing | Affected: Cross-border VASPs, exchanges with Sri Lankan clients | Horizon: 6-12 months | Confidence: Low
Facts: Sri Lanka announced a forthcoming virtual assetsFATF term for digital value representation tradable or transferable electronically regulatory framework that will include travel-rule-type provisions for cross-border VASPs. The framework signals a licensing or registration requirement for any exchangeA platform where users can buy, sell, or trade cryptocurrencies, broker, custodian, or stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold-related business with Sri Lankan clients, along with FATFGlobal standard-setter for combating money laundering and terrorist financing-style AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities/CFT controls.
Implications: Cross-border VASPs will need to ensure their systems can capture and transmit originatorPerson or entity sending a virtual asset transfer under Travel Rule requirements/beneficiaryPerson or entity receiving a virtual asset transfer under Travel Rule requirements data for Sri Lanka-linked transactionsA transfer of value or data recorded on a blockchain, verified by network participants, and permanently added to the distributed ledger once the travel-rule provisions take effect. Institutions routing flows via Sri Lankan counterparties should plan for counterparty due-diligence refresh once the new VASPEntity providing services related to virtual assets, subject to AML regulations register exists. The specifics remain to be published.
What Changed: South Africa SARS Publishes CARF Reporting Specifications
LowRisk: Tax/Reporting | Affected: Reporting Crypto Asset Service Providers (RCASPs), exchanges | Horizon: Implementation phase | Confidence: High
Facts: SARS (South African Revenue Service) published the Final External Business Requirements Specification (BRS) v1.5 for the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). Reporting Crypto Asset Service Providers (RCASPs) must carry out CARF-specific due diligenceProcess of verifying customer identity and assessing risk beyond general AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities/KYCA process where exchanges and financial institutions verify user identity, and align data models with both CARF_SARS (local) and CARF_OECD (global standard) schemas.
Implications: South Africa is among the first African jurisdictions to publish detailed CARF implementation specifications. RCASPs operating in South Africa now have a concrete technical standard to build reporting systems against. The dual-schema requirement (local SARS format plus OECD global standard) means firms must support both reporting formats - a model likely to be replicated as other CARF-participating jurisdictions publish their own BRS documents.
Regulations move faster than headlines.
One weekly brief. Every development that matters. No noise.
Read by compliance and legal teams at Standard Chartered, Lloyds, Freshfields, and Loyens & Loeff.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Risk Impact Matrix
| Jur. | Development | Risk Category | Severity | Affected | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | OCC GENIUS Act NPRM - stablecoin issuer licensing | Regulatory/Licensing | Critical | Non-bank stablecoin issuers, national banks | 6-18 months |
| EU | 20th sanctions package - blanket crypto ban on Russia | Sanctions/Compliance | Critical | CASPs, exchanges, payment firms in EU | Immediate-3 months |
| UK | Cryptoassets Regulations 2025 + FCA CP25/40 & CP25/41 | Regulatory/Licensing | Critical | Crypto exchanges, stablecoin issuers, custodians | Sep 2026 gateway, Oct 2027 regime |
| US | OCC conditional national trust bank charter for Crypto.com | Licensing | High | Crypto exchanges, trust companies, custodians | 3-12 months |
| US | SEC 2% capital haircut for qualifying payment stablecoins | Capital/Market structure | High | Broker-dealers, market makers, trading firms | Immediate |
| US | White House March 1 deadline - CLARITY Act stablecoin yield | Legislative/Policy | High | Stablecoin issuers, DeFi protocols, banks | March 1, 2026 |
| HK | SFC ASPIRe package: 12th VATP, perpetuals, market-makers | Product expansion | High | Licensed VATPs, institutional brokers | Immediate |
| GLOBAL | FATF plenary: Kuwait/PNG grey-listed, two VA reports | AML/CFT compliance | High | VASPs, stablecoin issuers, correspondent banks | 3-12 months |
| EU | AMLA draft RTS on sanctions penalties under AMLD6 | Enforcement | High | CASPs, banks, payment institutions across EU | 6-18 months |
| GLOBAL | Basel SCO60 national implementation - 1,250% risk weight | Prudential/Capital | High | Banks, bank-affiliated crypto entities | 2026-2027 |
| US | NASAA pushback on federal pre-emption in CLARITY/DCIA | Legislative | Medium | Digital asset exchanges, brokers, advisers | 6-12 months |
| CY | CySEC MiCA application deadline - February 27 | Licensing | Medium | Cyprus-authorized CASPs | Immediate |
| UK | FCA fines seven influencers - unauthorised crypto promotions | Enforcement | Medium | Influencers, crypto marketing firms, exchanges | Immediate |
| PK | Pakistan Virtual Assets Bill 2025 creates PVARA | Licensing | Medium | VASPs, exchanges in South Asian corridor | 6-12 months |
| BR | Central Bank Resolutions 517-521 crypto framework | Regulatory/Licensing | Medium | Exchanges, stablecoin issuers, payment firms | Transition periods active |
| ID | Bank Indonesia payments regulation effective March 31 | Regulatory | Medium | Payment providers, tokenized payment firms | March 31, 2026 |
| HK/KE | SFC-CMA Kenya cross-border MoU | Cross-border cooperation | Low | Groups with HK and Kenyan operations | Ongoing |
| LK | Sri Lanka VASP framework with travel-rule provisions | Licensing | Low | Cross-border VASPs, exchanges | 6-12 months |
| ZA | SARS CARF reporting specifications (BRS v1.5) | Tax/Reporting | Low | RCASPs, exchanges in South Africa | Implementation phase |
Cross-Signal Patterns
Pattern: The US Stablecoin Architecture Takes Shape Across Three Federal Agencies
Linked Signals: OCC GENIUS NPRM, SEC 2% Capital Haircut, Crypto.com Bank Charter, CLARITY Act March 1 Deadline, Basel SCO60
What it means: Five separate US regulatory actions in a single week - OCC's stablecoin issuer licensing framework, SEC's capital treatment for broker-dealer stablecoin holdings, OCC's conditional bank charter for a major exchange, the White House brokering a stablecoin yield compromise, and the Fed tying US implementation to the Basel standard - reveal the coordinated construction of a US stablecoin market infrastructure. Each agency is building its piece: the OCC handles issuer licensing, the SEC removes broker-dealer barriers, the Fed aligns prudential standards with Basel, and the White House resolves the legislative impasse. This is no longer improvisation. Firms that wait for final rules to plan their US stablecoin strategy will be 12-18 months behind competitors who begin structuring now.
Confidence: High
Pattern: EU Doubles Down on Sanctions Enforcement While Standardizing Penalties
Linked Signals: EU 20th Sanctions Package, AMLA Sanctions Penalties RTS, CySEC MiCA Deadline
What it means: The EU is simultaneously expanding the scope of sanctions (blanket crypto ban on Russia, first use of the Anti-Circumvention Tool) and standardizing the penalty framework for enforcement (AMLA RTS). These are two sides of the same coin: broader obligations paired with more predictable consequences for non-compliance. The CySEC MiCA deadline adds urgency - firms must not only obtain authorization but also be prepared for enhanced sanctions screening and a standardized penalty regime from day one. The era of variable national enforcement approaches is ending.
Confidence: High
Pattern: Three Major Jurisdictions Build Comprehensive Crypto Perimeters Simultaneously
Linked Signals: OCC GENIUS NPRM, UK Cryptoassets Regulations, Brazil Central Bank Framework, FCA Influencer Fines
What it means: The US, UK, and Brazil are all constructing comprehensive regulatory perimeters in the same week. The US is building from legislation outward (GENIUS Act to NPRM), the UK is expanding an existing financial services framework (RAO extension) and immediately enforcing the promotional rules that underpin it, and Brazil is using central bank authority to regulate a stablecoin-dominant market. Each approach reflects the jurisdiction's regulatory tradition, but the destination is converging: licensed issuers, supervised platforms, and regulated custody. Multi-jurisdictional firms face the challenge of satisfying three distinct but conceptually similar frameworks with different timelines.
Confidence: High
Pattern: Global AML Perimeter Closes Around Self-Custody and Cross-Border Flows
Linked Signals: FATF Plenary, EU Sanctions Package, Pakistan PVARA, Sri Lanka VASP Framework, South Africa CARF
What it means: FATF's reports targeting offshore VASPs and stablecoins with unhosted wallets, the EU's blanket crypto ban on Russia, Pakistan's creation of PVARA, Sri Lanka's travel-rule-aligned VASP framework, and South Africa's CARF reporting specifications all point in the same direction: the global AML perimeter is closing around previously unregulated flows. FATF is setting expectations, the EU is enforcing through sanctions, and emerging markets from South Asia to Southern Africa are building the institutional capacity to implement them. Self-custody, cross-border stablecoin transfers, and operations in jurisdictions without VASP licensing will face escalating costs through 2026-2027.
Confidence: High
Pattern: Asia-Pacific Regulatory Expansion Deepens Across Products and Cooperation
Linked Signals: HK SFC ASPIRe Package, SFC-CMA Kenya MoU, Indonesia BI Payments, Sri Lanka VASP Framework
What it means: Hong Kong is deepening its regulated product suite (perpetuals, margin, market-making) while simultaneously extending its supervisory cooperation to Africa through the Kenya MoU. Indonesia is consolidating payment system oversight ahead of a hard March 31 deadline. Sri Lanka is building a FATF-aligned VASP regime. The pattern is clear: APAC regulatory coverage is expanding both vertically (deeper product regulation within established centers) and horizontally (new jurisdictions creating frameworks for the first time). Firms planning APAC market entry face a narrowing window of unregulated operation.
Confidence: Medium
Strategic Implications
1. Begin GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing Compliance Planning Before Final Rules
The OCC NPRM establishes the structural framework for US stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold issuer licensing. Firms should assess the OCC vs. bank-subsidiary licensing route now. The GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing's timeline trigger means the compliance window could be shorter than expected. Comment on the NPRM during the notice-and-comment period. The parallel SECU.S. federal agency regulating securities markets and protecting investors 2% haircut and CLARITY ActUS legislation defining the market structure and jurisdictional oversight for trading payment stablecoins March 1 deadline mean the US stablecoin architecture is moving on multiple fronts simultaneously. [Traced to: OCC GENIUS NPRM, SEC 2% Haircut, CLARITY Act March 1 Deadline, Basel SCO60]
2. Implement EU Sanctions ScreeningChecking customers and transactions against government sanctions lists for Digital Ruble and Russia-Linked Crypto
The proposed 20th sanctions package, combined with AMLA's standardized penalty framework, creates an urgent compliance imperative. Review screening systems for digital ruble and Russia-linked stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold exposure immediately. Map indirect exposure through Central Asian channels (Kyrgyzstan identified). The AMLA RTS means non-compliance will be penalized more severely than under current disparate national approaches. [Traced to: EU 20th Sanctions Package, AMLA RTS, CySEC MiCAThe EU's comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto-assets, establishing harmonized rules for issuers and service providers across all 27 Member States Deadline]
3. Prepare UK FCAUK's financial regulator overseeing conduct of firms and markets to protect consumers Authorization Applications Now
The September 2026 gateway gives approximately 18 months, but the FCA's processing times and expected application volumes mean early preparation is essential. Engage with CP25/40 and CP25/41 consultations. The FCA influencer fines demonstrate that enforcement of the existing promotional rules is already active - firms should not wait for the full regime to ensure marketing compliance. [Traced to: UK Cryptoassets Regulations, FCA Influencer Fines]
4. Model Capital Impact Under Basel SCO60 National Implementations
The 1,250% risk weight for Group 2 unbacked crypto makes direct bank exposure economically prohibitive. But US implementation through the GENIUS ActUS law (July 2025) requiring payment stablecoin issuers to be regulated entities with 1:1 reserve backing may create more favorable stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold treatment than the bare Basel standard. Banks evaluating crypto custodyService for securely storing and managing cryptocurrency assets, trading, or stablecoin issuance must model capital impact under both the Basel standard and the national implementation version in each jurisdiction they operate. [Traced to: Basel SCO60, OCC GENIUS NPRM]
5. Audit AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities Programs for Self-Custody and Cross-Border StablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold Exposure
FATFGlobal standard-setter for combating money laundering and terrorist financing's forthcoming reports will set the agenda for the next cycle of national AMLRegulatory framework requiring financial institutions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities rule updates. Do not wait for publication - begin assessing self-custody flow exposure and correspondent relationships with weakly supervised jurisdictions. Kuwait's grey-listing adds another EDDHeightened customer verification for high-risk individuals or entities trigger. Sri Lanka's travel-rule provisions and South Africa's CARF specifications signal that the compliance perimeter is expanding into markets that were previously unmonitored. For firms in Brazil, the new framework adds FX reporting obligations to stablecoinA cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, such as USD or gold flows. [Traced to: FATF Plenary, Sri Lanka VASPEntity providing services related to virtual assets, subject to AML regulations, South Africa CARF, Brazil Central Bank]
6. Build APAC Strategy Across Deepening and Expanding Frameworks
Hong Kong's expanded product suite (perpetuals, margin, market-making affiliates), Indonesia's March 31 payment system deadline, and Sri Lanka's forthcoming VASPEntity providing services related to virtual assets, subject to AML regulations framework mean APAC regulatory coverage is both deepening and widening. Firms targeting institutional clients should evaluate Hong Kong for the full product suite, monitor Indonesia for tokenized payment classification, and plan for new compliance requirements in previously unregulated South Asian markets. [Traced to: HK SFC ASPIRe, Indonesia BI Payments, Sri Lanka VASP, SFC-CMA Kenya MoU]
Sources
- OCC NPRM - GENIUS Act Implementation (February 2026)
- OCC NPRM Full Text (PDF)
- Federal Reserve - Vice Chair Bowman Testimony, February 26, 2026
- EU 20th Sanctions Package Reporting (Yahoo Finance)
- Scorechain - EU Sanctions and A7A5 Stablecoin
- AMLA Consultation Paper - Draft RTS Article 53(10) AMLD6
- UK Cryptoassets Regulations 2025 - FCA New Regime
- FCA CP25/40 - Regulating Cryptoasset Activities
- FCA CP25/41 - Admissions, Disclosures, and Market Abuse
- FCA Influencer Fines - Press Release
- FinTech Futures - Crypto.com National Trust Bank Charter
- SEC Division of Trading and Markets - Crypto FAQs (Rule 15c3-1)
- SEC Commissioner Peirce - "Cutting by Two Would Do"
- The Block - SEC Stablecoin Capital Guidance
- White House CLARITY Act Negotiations (Disruption Banking)
- Hong Kong SFC - Licensed VATPs List
- SFC ASPIRe Circulars - VA Dealing, Perpetual Contracts, Market-Makers (February 2026)
- SFC-CMA Kenya MoU Announcement
- FATF February 2026 Plenary Outcomes (Thistle Initiatives)
- FATF Plenary - Crypto Misuse Warning (Bitcoin.com)
- Basel Committee - Cryptoasset Prudential Standard SCO60
- NASAA Letter - Protecting State Authority (February 25, 2026)
- CySEC MiCA Deadline Reminder (Finance Magnates)
- Pakistan Virtual Assets Bill 2025 (The News International)
- Brazil Central Bank Crypto Framework (Chainalysis)
- Brazil Crypto Volume and Stablecoin Share (ANBIMA)
- Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 10/2025 (Linklaters Asia FinTech Bulletin)
- South Africa SARS CARF BRS v1.5
If you found this useful, please share it.
Questions or feedback? Contact us
MCMS Brief • Classification: Public • Sector: Digital Assets • Region: Global
Disclaimer: This content is for educational and informational purposes only. It is NOT financial, investment, or legal advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk. Always consult qualified professionals before making any investment decisions. Make Crypto Make Sense assumes no liability for any financial losses resulting from the use of this information. Full Terms